Why does this page look this way?
It appears that you are using either an older, classic Web browser or a hand-held device that allows you to view our content but may not work with every feature of our site. If you are using an older browser, please upgrade for the best experience.
![]()
Home |
Site Index |
FAQs |
Contact |
RSS
|
Podcast
Navigation
home > by publication type > daily analysis > Helping Latin America Help Itself
| Author: |
|---|
A boy searches for recyclable items at a municipal garbage dump in Nicaragua. (AP/Esteban Felix)
U.S. policy in Latin America has long focused on opening economies, strengthening democracy, and battling drug trafficking. Over time the United States can point to a growing number of market-oriented economies and improved bilateral ties with some states. But region-wide, the United States faces lingering mistrust over its policies, some of it embedded in resentment over the Washington Consensus (PDF), a set of 1990s macroeconomic policies that critics say failed to benefit the poor. Recent speeches from the Bush administration have focused on issues of social justice, but funding for such initiatives remains limited. Latin American experts lament the lack of sustained U.S. attention in the region, with groups such as the Washington Office on Latin America faulting U.S. policy for increasing anti-Americanism (PDF). A new CFR Independent Task Force on U.S. policy toward Latin America suggests that strained relations in the region “are less a result of alleged U.S. policy failings than a product of deeper changes: while the basic tenets of U.S. policy have not changed, Latin America has.”
The CFR task force, a bipartisan group of top policy experts, calls for Washington to transform its policy toward the region to target four priority areas: poverty and inequality; citizen security; migration; and energy security and integration. It urges U.S. policymakers to study how to bolster poverty-fighting measures—such as microfinance and conditional cash transfers—that have already met success in individual countries. The Task Force also argues that Washington can learn from the way Latin American governments have adapted to migration—for instance, by adopting policies to encourage circular migration and remittance flows. “U.S. policies lag far behind those of Latin American governments in adapting to the realities of increased human mobility,” the report says.
Another potential benefit of improved regional ties is energy security. The region provides nearly 30 percent of U.S. oil imports, but increasing resource nationalization in Venezuela and Bolivia has imperiled future production levels, as this Backgrounder discusses. Experts suggest there are opportunities for U.S.-Latin America cooperation on promoting alternative energy sources. The United States and Brazil are the biggest global producers of ethanol, and experts such as David Rothkopf argue that the region has the potential to become a global leader in biofuels production. Skyrocketing global food prices have dampened enthusiasm for biofuels in recent months, however, as evidenced by a recent TIME magazine cover story titled “The Clean Energy Scam.”
The recommendations from CFR’s task force emerge in the middle of a U.S. presidential cycle that has so far largely neglected Latin American policy. Discussion of U.S. policy toward Latin America on the campaign trail has been confined to the occasional remark on Cuba or Mexican immigrants. The current U.S. political mood on two subjects of resonance for the region—trade and immigration—is somewhat dim, with the failure of comprehensive immigration reform in 2007 and a free trade agreement with Colombia facing strong congressional resistance. Writing on the Colombia trade agreement, two experts opine in the Latin Business Chronicle that, “In 2008, voters may rightfully begin to ask who lost an entire region. In this case, it will be ‘Who lost Latin America?’” Yet Washington Post columnist Marcela Sanchez argues that if the United States manages to address its domestic challenges, “few regions stand to benefit as much as Latin America.” And experts and policymakers are looking to the election of a new president as an opportunity to change course in the region. CFR Fellow Shannon O'Neil says the change of administration offers a “big opportunity for recalibration.”
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
![]()
In Termites in the Trading System, Jagdish Bhagwati reveals how the rapid spread of preferential trade agreements endangers the world trading system.
America Between the Wars explores how the decisions and debates of the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Twin Towers shaped the events, arguments, and politics of the world we live in today.
In The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State, Noah Feldman tells the story behind the increasingly popular call for the establishment of the sharia—the law of the traditional Islamic state—in the modern Muslim world.
Complete list of CFR Books.
![]()
![]()
This report argues that the United States must lead with domestic action on climate change and proposes a U.S. negotiating strategy for a global UN climate agreement that includes commitments from all major economies, while also promoting a less formal Partnership for Climate Cooperation that would focus the world's largest emitters on implementing aggressive emissions reductions.
This Task Force report examines changes in Latin America and in U.S. influence there, while taking account of the region's enduring importance to the United States. The Task Force offers an agenda for U.S. policy toward Latin America and identifies four critical areas that should provide the basis of a new U.S. approach.
About Independent Task Forces at the Council.
![]()
![]()
After two decades of liberalization, many countries around the world are adopting new restrictions on foreign direct investment (FDI) that could retard continued progress. The authors make recommendations for correcting this protectionist drift by proposing guidelines for how countries can better regulate FDI yet still reap its economic benefits.
In this Council Special Report, the authors make a strong case that the Bush administration’s policy of diplomatic isolation of Syria is not serving U.S. interests, and offer informed history and thoughtful analysis of the country and its external behavior.
Complete list of Council Special Reports.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
To order Task Force reports, Council Special Reports, and Critical Policy Choices, please call, fax, or order online from our distributor, the Brookings Institution Press: phone +1-800-537-5487, fax +1-410-516-6998.
For information on other reports that are not for sale, or for general publications information, please call +1-212-434-9516 or email publications@cfr.org.
![]()
![]()
To request permission to reuse Council materials, please email publications@cfr.org or fax +1-212-434-9859.
Please include the complete information of the requested work—author, title, sections/pages to be copied or reprinted, and number of copies to be made—along with a brief description of where and how you would like to reuse the work.
You may also request permission for Council material through Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please click on the logo below.
![]()
By Region | By Issue | By Publication Type | The Think Tank | For The Media | For Educators | About CFR
Home | Site Index | FAQ | Contact | RSS | Podcast
Copyright 2008 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.

