Another sign the world is changing
More on:
There was a time not-so-long ago when troubled banks in emerging economies, sometimes formerly state-run banks, looked to private banks in the US and Europe for equity infusions. Now, well, troubled banks and broker-dealers in the US and Europe seem to be looking to banks -- often state-owned banks and investment companies -- in the emerging world for help ...
I (obviously) have no idea if CITIC is going to invest in Bear. The Bear-China Construction deal never happened. But it would be consistent with recent trends.
There was a strong presumption several years ago that China's financial system would -- over time -- evolve so that it looked more like the US financial system and, I suspect, an presumption that private US and European financial firms would be major players in China's domestic markets. Now in a world of "reverse globalization" it is at least plausible that China's state (along with financial institutions controlled by China's state) could end up with a significant ownership stake in US banks, US broker-dealers and US private equity firms, which would, in a way, make the US financial system look a bit more like China's financial system.
Potential ironies abound. The US government has long resisted any suggestion that hedge funds be required to disclose their positions. But CITIC buys a stake in Bear, China's state -- through CITIC -- could conceivably end up having access to a fair amount of information about the positions of some US hedge funds. Bear is a big prime broker, and a large equity investor like CITIC would certainly have every right to know what risks Bear is taking.
It wouldn't be entirely unprecedented for a government to invest in a financial firm to get access to financial information: the Bank of Italy claimed it invested in LTCM in part to understand how hedge funds were influencing the Italian BTP market ...
The intermingling of public and private money -- in a world where "socialism is for capitalists" and "capitalism is for socialists" -- does raise some interesting questions -- questions that I am still struggling with.
I wonder what Michael Pettis -- who worked for Bear at one time -- thinks ...
NOTE: I edited this post somewhat after initially posting it to try to make my intended meaning clearer, and also to correct a couple of egregious spelling errors.
More on: